The Sunshine Physician Payment Final Rule Overview and Analysis

Source: March 2013 ReedSmith:  On February 1, 2013, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) released the long-awaited Final Rule (Rule) to implement the “Sunshine” provisions of the Affordable Care Act of 2010 (ACA). These require that certain manufacturers of drugs, devices, biologicals, and medical supplies covered by Medicare, Medicaid and CHIP report annually to HHS identified payments or transfers of value they have made to physicians and teaching hospitals. In addition, the Sunshine provisions require manufacturers and certain group purchasing organizations (GPOs) to report to HHS information on physician ownership and investment interests.

The underlying purpose of the Sunshine provisions is to provide increased transparency on the scope and nature of financial and other relationships among manufacturers, physicians, and teaching hospitals, on the theory that such transparency will enable patients to make more informed treatment decisions – and assess possible conflicts of interest. In its 2011 proposed rule, CMS had requested comment on almost every aspect of the new requirements, and the Final Rule is lengthy and complex.  It provides needed clarity on some troubling aspects of the proposal, but it leaves a number of questions unanswered. Whether the transparency reports that CMS eventually publishes on a publicly available website will prove enlightening or merely confusing – and potentially susceptible to inaccuracy and misinterpretation – remains to be seen. Of more concern is whether the new reporting mandates will have a chilling effect on the desire of physicians and teaching hospitals to continue to engage in research, educational efforts, and the like.

The attached Client Alert will provide an overview and summary of the Rule, including the important issues below:

  1. When manufacturers need to begin collecting and reporting information to HHS;
  2. Which types of “applicable manufacturers” will have to file reports;
  3. How manufacturers are to identify the physicians and teaching hospitals (known as “covered recipients”) that receive the reportable payments;
  4. Which general types/categories of payments and transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals will need to be reported, and which can be excluded;
  5. Special rules for research-related payments;
  6. When reporting can be delayed for payments involving confidential and proprietary research or product development;
  7. Which entities will need to report physician ownership and investment interests;
  8. How manufacturers, GPOs, physicians, teaching hospitals, and physician owners and investors should handle disputed information; and Penalties for nonreporting and inaccurate reporting.

To download the full report and analysis, please click here SUNSHINE

HIPAA Self Pay Rule

As they prepare to meet the Sept. 23 compliance deadline for the HIPAA Omnibus Rule, security leaders at healthcare organizations are finding one requirement particularly challenging.  The rule requires organizations to accommodate patients’ requests to not disclose to their health insurer information about a product or service that they paid for out of their own pockets.  Carrying out this requirement could prove difficult, in large part, because many electronic health record, e-prescribing and other information systems lack features that easily allow segments of data to be flagged or withheld from electronic transmission.  For more information please click here HIPAA SELF PAY RULE

Ankle-Foot Orthoses/Knee-Ankle-Foot Orthoses LCD related Policy Article – Revised

The related Policy Article for the Ankle-Foot Orthosis/Knee-Ankle-Foot Orthosis is being revised. The Policy Article with an effective date of January 1, 2013 included Coding Guidelines for AFOs that included a height requirement. The height requirement is being removed. The effective date for the revised Policy Article is for dates of service on or after January 1, 2013.  Please click here for announcement

OIG Calls for Cuts in Medicare Rates for Back Orthoses

The OIG is calling on CMS to lower Medicare payment for certain back orthosis products, either by subjecting these products to the Medicare durable medical equipment, prosthetics, orthotics, and supplies (DMEPOS) competitive bidding program or by making an inherent reasonableness adjustment. This recommendation stems from the OIG’s findings that Medicare payment amounts far exceeded supplier acquisition costs for lumbar-sacral orthoses billed under L0631. Specifically, between July 2010 and June 2011, the average Medicare-allowed amount for L0631 was $919, compared to the average supplier acquisition cost of $191, resulting in Medicare paying an estimated $37 million more than supplier costs.  Please click here for more information

HCPCS Code L0430 – Invalid

Effective for dates of service on or after November 17, 2012, Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System (HCPCS) code L0430 (SPINAL ORTHOSIS, ANTERIOR-POSTERIOR-LATERAL CONTROL, WITH INTERFACE MATERIAL, CUSTOM FITTED (DEWALL POSTURE PROTECTOR ONLY)) will be invalid for claim submission to the Durable Medical Equipment Medicare Administrative Contractors (DME MACs).  Products previously coded L0430 by the Pricing, Data Analysis and Coding (PDAC) contractor and posted to the Durable Medical Equipment Coding System (DMECS) will be end dated on November 17, 2012.  Please click here for more information.